ArticleDevelopmental science2026
Trusting Wisely? Developmental Changes in How Children Learn and Adapt to Partner Trustworthiness.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trusting selectively is a crucial ability in successfully navigating social environments: trusting a trustworthy partner maximizes mutual benefits; withholding trust from an untrustworthy partner minimizes chances of being exploited. Here, we ask how children's trust expectations and experienced trustworthiness inform their own trust decisions. Using a child-friendly repeated Trust Game, we employ a computational modeling approach to examine how children learn about the trustworthiness of others through experience and adjust their own trust behaviors. We tested N = 96 children ages 6-11 years who played 40 trials of the game as trustors with a trustworthy and an untrustworthy trustee. Regression analyses showed that overall, children shared more with trustworthy than untrustworthy partners and older children shared overall more than younger children. Computational models provided a more fine-grained analysis of the learning pattern: a reinforcement learning model that included parameters for individual variation in prior trust expectations and a parameter quantifying the behavioral adjustment over time provided the best fit for the data. Using this computational approach, we could ascertain that children's behavioral adjustments became less responsive over time, suggesting a shift toward more stable patterns of trust once initial impressions were formed. Together, these findings shed light on the development of children's trust interaction with novel partners and highlight the opportunity that computational modeling provides in capturing developmental differences in trust behaviors. SUMMARY: Children aged 6-11 used experience to distinguish trustworthy from untrustworthy partners in a repeated Trust Game, sharing more with the trustworthy than the untrustworthy partner. Older children shared more than younger children, although they were not significantly differentiating between the trustworthy than the untrustworthy partner. Reinforcement learning modeling suggested that children updated trust expectations from experience, with age-related differences in the efficiency of impression updating. These findings highlight both children's capacity in flexibly adjusting their economic trust behaviors and the value of computational modeling in studying economic trust development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.