ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2026
Exploring the 'train the trainer' model for delivering Making Every Contact Count (MECC) training at scale: A qualitative study.
Article in British journal of health psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the delivery of the train the trainer (TtT) model for Making Every Contact Count (MECC) training in the North East and North Cumbria (NENC) region of England.
designA qualitative study, utilizing semi-structured interviews.
methodsInterviews were conducted with 21 participants, including MECC TtT trainees (n = 13), eligible non-trainees (n = 6) and principal trainers (n = 2). Data analysis utilized the Framework Method guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and meta-themes were generated that transcended individual TDF domains.
resultsFour meta-themes were identified: the need for psychological preparedness to deliver MECC training, successful cascade is influenced by the MECC training content, limited accessibility of the pedagogical approach to both MECC TtT and MECC training, and a need to shift the focus from quantity to quality of MECC training cascade.
conclusionsThe TtT model potentially provides unique value for delivering high-quality MECC training at scale, providing trainers feel ownership over and able to deliver MECC training. A skills-based approach to MECC training and an experiential learning approach to MECC TtT training are recommended. The MECC TtT programme should provide clear expectations of cascade at sign up stage, allow trainers to adapt content and evaluate success based on quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.