ReviewImmunity, inflammation and disease2026
The Role and Importance of Procalcitonin (PCT) Testing in Rational Antibiotic Prescribing and Antibiotic Stewardship Programs.
Review in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAntibiotic resistance is a critical global health issue, primarily driven by inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Identifying reliable biomarkers to guide antibiotic use is essential to combat this challenge. Procalcitonin (PCT) testing has emerged as a promising tool for differentiating bacterial infections from non-bacterial conditions and supporting antibiotic stewardship programs. This literature review evaluates evidence from randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and real-world clinical data to assess the clinical utility of PCT testing in guiding antibiotic prescribing decisions.
resultsAcross randomized controlled trials and real-world studies, PCT-guided algorithms typically yielded reductions in antibiotic duration of approximately 0.9 to 3 days in large adult cohorts, with some smaller or source-specific trials reporting reductions of up to 6 days. Relative decreases in antibiotic exposure varied widely across studies (ranging from approximately 8% to > 50%). Importantly, these reductions were achieved without increases in short-term or 28-day mortality, while hospital length of stay remained largely unchanged. Studies generally indicate that PCT-guided strategies are cost-effective, primarily driven by reduced antibiotic use. However, challenges such as interpretive difficulties, false-positive and negative results, and implementation barriers remain.
conclusionIncorporating PCT testing into antibiotic stewardship strategies offers a promising approach to enhance prescribing accuracy, reduce antibiotic resistance risks, and improve patient care quality. Future research should focus on refining clinical guidelines, expanding applicability across diverse patient populations, and addressing practical challenges to facilitate widespread adoption of PCT testing in routine clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.