Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42036698›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2026

Adjuvant choice shapes macrophage activation and cytokine responses to freeze-thaw breast cancer antigens.

Murat Ihlamur, Emrah Şefik Abamor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Murat IhlamurDepartment of Bioengineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. mihlamur@biruni.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0458-5638
Emrah Şefik AbamorDepartment of Bioengineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9174-4528

Funding

Yildiz Technical University Scientific Research Project Coordination Department FBA-2022-5004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate how different adjuvants influence macrophage activation induced by freeze–thaw whole-cell lysates prepared from two breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231), we evaluated the effects of alum and saponin in J774 macrophages by assessing cell viability, nitric oxide (NO) production, and cytokine responses.

resultsFreeze–thaw breast cancer antigens (FTBA) triggered macrophage responses in a dose-dependent manner, with 40 µg/mL providing a suitable balance between activation and viability. When combined with adjuvants, FTBA + alum maintained higher macrophage viability compared with FTBA + saponin. Alum-adjuvanted FTBA induced stronger NO production than saponin-adjuvanted formulations. Cytokine profiling showed that alum-adjuvanted FTBA induced the strongest cytokine responses overall, with fold-increases in IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α, and GM-CSF observed for both antigen sources. Overall, alum enhanced macrophage activation with lower cytotoxicity than saponin, indicating that adjuvant selection significantly modulates innate immune responses to freeze–thaw tumor antigens.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAlum CompoundsAntigens, NeoplasmBreast NeoplasmsCytokinesMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesSaponinsAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalFemaleFreezingHumansMCF-7 CellsMiceAdjuvants, ImmunologicAlum Compoundsaluminum sulfateAntigens, NeoplasmCytokinesNitric OxideSaponinsAdjuvantsBreast cancerCancer vaccinesImmunotherapyTumor antigens

Identifiers

PMID42036698
PMCPMC13248295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.