Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42036692›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026

Comparative analysis of different mobility aids in the early accelerated rehabilitation phase following acute achilles tendon repair surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Zhuoqi Wei, Zengzhen Cui, Yuan Cao, Xiuzhi Li, Yuliang Fu, Liangyu Bai, Yang Lv

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04663542 (A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on the Comparison of the Treatment Outcomes of Different Immobilization Times After the Repair of Achilles Tendon Rupture), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04663542 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on the Comparison of the Treatment Outcomes of Different Immobilization Times After the Repair of Achilles Tendon Rupture

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University Third HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled240ConditionsAchilles Tendon RuptureArmsimmobilization duration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhuoqi Wei *Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian Qu, Beijing, 100191, China.
Zengzhen Cui *Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian Qu, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yuan CaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian Qu, Beijing, 100191, China.
Xiuzhi LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian Qu, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yuliang FuDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian Qu, Beijing, 100191, China.
Liangyu BaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian Qu, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yang LvDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian Qu, Beijing, 100191, China. lvyang42@126.com.

Funding

Capital health development research project 2022-2-4096Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2023YFC2508804Peking University Third Hospital BYSYZHKC117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of different mobility aids during the early rehabilitation phase following surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR).

methodsThis prospective cohort study included 198 patients who underwent surgical repair for AATR between April 2023 and February 2025, with 171 males (86.4%) and a mean age of 36.4 years. Based on the mobility aid used weeks 3-6 postoperatively, participants were categorized into four groups: Wheelchair (n = 43), Knee Scooter (n = 41), Axillary Crutches (n = 78), and Leg Support (LS) Walker (n = 36). Patients were scheduled for assessments at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 weeks, with an additional telephone follow-up conducted approximately one year after surgery. Primary outcomes included the rate of unplanned Emergency Department (ED) visits, the affected-to-unaffected (A: U) calf circumference ratio, and expected rehabilitation costs. Secondary outcomes encompassed the Visual Analog Scale, the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score, the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score, and time to key recovery milestones, including single-leg heel raise to 50% of contralateral side, return to light exercise, return to work, and return to pre-injury exercise. Continuous variables were analyzed using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test, and categorical variables using chi-square or Fisher's exact test, while linear mixed-effects models were employed for longitudinal outcomes.

resultsDuring the early rehabilitation phase (Weeks 3-6), unplanned ED visit rates differed significantly among the four groups (p = 0.032), with the Axillary Crutches showing significantly higher odds than the Wheelchair (OR = 8.24, 95% CI 1.16-58.53, p = 0.040). A significant difference in the A: U ratio was observed among the four groups at 6 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.037), and post-hoc comparisons showed significant differences for LS Walker vs. Wheelchair (p < 0.001), Axillary Crutches vs. Wheelchair (p = 0.002), and LS Walker vs. Knee Scooter (p = 0.038). The LS Walker and Axillary Crutches also demonstrated superior performance in VAS, ATRS, and AOFAS scores from Week 4 to Week 12, and achieved key recovery milestones significantly earlier (p < 0.001). Economic analysis revealed the lower direct treatment costs in the Axillary Crutches (477 RMB) and Knee Scooter (539 RMB), followed by the Wheelchair (664 RMB) and LS Walker (1126 RMB) (p < 0.001).

conclusionsLS Walker demonstrated superior efficacy in preserving muscle and accelerating functional recovery, while Knee Scooter offered a favorable profile for fall prevention and cost-effectiveness.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04663542), registered on 22 September 2020.

Indexed as

Achilles TendonTendon InjuriesWalkersAdultCohort StudiesCost-Effectiveness AnalysisCrutchesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionRuptureTime FactorsAccelerated rehabilitationAcute Achilles tendon ruptureMobility aidsSurgical repair

Identifiers

PMID42036692
PMCPMC13123103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.