Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42036679›Full record

ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026

Medical device development and innovation for rare and pediatric populations: a global landscape overview.

Marc Dooms, Daniel O'Connor, Tom Melvin, Friederike Mueller, Vasum Peiris, Katie Pohlson, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Anneliene Hechtelt Jonker, IRDiRC WG Medical Technologies for Rare Diseases

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marc DoomsUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Daniel O'ConnorInternational Rare Diseases Research Consortium, Paris, France.
Tom MelvinInternational Rare Diseases Research Consortium, Paris, France.
Friederike MuellerInternational Rare Diseases Research Consortium, Paris, France.
Vasum PeirisInternational Rare Diseases Research Consortium, Paris, France.
Katie PohlsonInternational Rare Diseases Research Consortium, Paris, France.
Durhane Wong-RiegerInternational Rare Diseases Research Consortium, Paris, France.
Anneliene Hechtelt JonkerInternational Rare Diseases Research Consortium, Paris, France. a.h.jonker@utwente.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5883-7610
IRDiRC WG Medical Technologies for Rare Diseases

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The landscape of orphan therapies has predominantly emphasized drugs and biologics over medical devices for rare diseases. Recent technological advancements, particularly in digital remote monitoring and other innovative technologies, have unveiled new prospects for orphan device development. This shift underscores the potential of these devices in the prevention, diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, and overall enhancement of wellbeing of people living with rare disease. However, despite their significance, only a small percentage of rare diseases currently have approved orphan devices, creating a substantial unmet need for their development. In order to better understand the current orphan device landscape, the International Rare Diseases Research Consortium (IRDiRC) Working Group on Medical Technologies for rare diseases set out to investigate the regulatory landscape, some of the current developments, and the basis of patient engagement in orphan device development. Existing regulatory frameworks vary across regions, offering specific designations and incentives, such as the Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) in the United States, Japan’s orphan device designation criteria, and conditional approvals in China. Notably, Europe lacks specific legislation for rare diseases within its medical device regulations, but has developed guidance. Initiatives like the Pediatric Device Consortia Grant Program and System of Hospitals for Innovation in Pediatrics – Medical Devices (SHIP-MD) in the U.S. and the EU4Health co-funded projects in the EU aim to accelerate medical device development, particularly for children and rare diseases. Moreover, patient engagement remains crucial throughout the device development process, emphasizing the need for patient involvement in setting research priorities, study design, execution, and post-approval stages. Furthermore, greater harmonization across regulatory jurisdictions, and greater emphasis on patient engagement may help to facilitate opportunities to address the need for medical devices specifically designed and labelled for rare disease and pediatric populations. Enhancing collaboration among stakeholders, including people living with rare diseases, holds promise for advancing the development of tailored medical devices for rare diseases, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

Indexed as

Equipment and SuppliesRare DiseasesChildHumansPediatricsMedical technologyOrphan devicesPediatricsRare diseasesResearch and development

Identifiers

PMID42036679
PMCPMC13276941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.