ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2026
Ethnobotanical study of traditional herbal medicine in the multi-ethnic convergence zone of Northwestern, Guizhou, China.
Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ethnobotanical study on medicinal plants used by Jinuo people in Yunnan, China.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTraditional herbal medicine has played a vital role in human societies, contributing to health through both therapeutic and nutritional functions. This study aims to document the medicinal plants in the multi-ethnic areas of Guizhou Province, China, and quantitatively evaluate the diversity of traditional knowledge and its cultural significance.
methodsWe conducted field investigations with 103 respondents from 7 ethnic groups (including Han and six ethnic minorities) within the region, utilizing key informant interviews, semi-structured interviews, and participatory rural appraisal to systematically collect ethnobotanical knowledge. This included the types of medicinal plants, their parts used, traditional processing methods, indications, and application scenarios. Quantitative ethnobotanical indices, including National Cultural Significance Index (NCSI), Shannon-Wiener Index (H'), Simpson Index (D), and Sorenson Similarity Index (CS), were employed to evaluate herbal importance, diversity, evenness, and knowledge similarity among different villages and ethnic groups.
resultsA total of 200 medicinal materials (85 families, 169 genera) were recorded, with Fabaceae being the most represented family. They are mainly used to treat rheumatism and other common ailments, typically prepared as decoctions. Medicinal plant knowledge demonstrated high diversity and evenness across villages and ethnic groups (Shannon-Wiener indices ranging from 3.23 to 3.59, and Simpson indices from 0.0091 to 0.0186. The top three most frequently used species were Cynanchum auriculatum (HUF = 0.17), Lygodium japonicum (HUF = 0.16), and Pleuropterus multiflorus (HUF = 0.15). Taraxacum mongolicum holds the highest cultural significance (NCSI = 700). Intervillage and interethnic similarity showed low to moderate levels (Sorensen CS: 0.19 to 0.60 among villages; 0.31 to 0.62 among ethnic groups). Notably, only 45 species (22.5%) were shared across five or more villages, while 109 species (54.5%) were recorded in only one or two villages, reflecting a "limited similarity" pattern. The shared core resources mirror the fundamental role of the environment, while the ethnoculturally specific nature of the knowledge emphasizes the cultural shaping forces.
conclusionThese findings indicate that the internal diversity of traditional knowledge of medicinal plants in multi-ethnic areas is high, and there is "limited similarity" among villages and ethnic groups. The environment and culture jointly shape the formation of traditional medicinal knowledge. This research provides basic data for the protection and sustainable utilization of medicinal resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.