ArticleBMC medical education2026
A perspective on moral sensitivity: undergraduate dentistry students and orthodontic clinicians.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn dentistry, moral judgment skills are a fundamental competency that helps dentists make the best decisions when faced with challenging clinical problems and ethical dilemmas. The aim was toexamine the moral sensitivity levels of fourth- and fifth-grade dentistry students and orthodontic clinicians.
methodsThe study included fourth-grade (n = 116) and fifth-grade dentistry students (n = 106) as well as orthodontic clinicians, including residents and specialists (n = 117). Data were collected using a sociodemographic form and the self-administered Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (MSQ) including six sub-dimensions: autonomy, holistic approach, conflict, orientation, providing benefit, and application. Participants were asked to rate the questionnaire on a 7-point Likert-type scale. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used in reliability analysis. Continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation, and categorical variables were summarized as frequency and percentage. Intergroup differences were assessed by one-way ANOVA. Pairwise comparisons were further identified with Tukey's post-hoc test. Two-way ANOVA was performed to assess the combined effects of group and demographic variables on the total scale score.
resultsThe overall reliability of the MSQ scale was 0.84. The total moral sensitivity scores for fourth-grade, fifth-grade students, and orthodontic clinicians were 92.7 ± 15.7, 92.4 ± 17.8, and 93.8 ± 14.4, respectively, revealing no statistically significant difference. Fifth-grade students scored significantly lower than orthodontic clinicians on the Holistic Approach and Conflict sub-dimensions but scored significantly higher on the Orientation sub-dimension compared to orthodontic clinicians.
conclusionsUndergraduate dentistry students and orthodontic clinicians exhibited moderate levels of moral sensitivity. Fifth-grade students were found to have higher moral sensitivity thanorthodontic clinicians on the holistic approach and conflict sub-dimensions, while orthodontic clinicians were found to be more sensitive on the orientation sub-dimension. These differences suggest that integrating case-based ethics training into the dental curriculum, regardless of academic year, can help students better identify ethical issues and develop strategies to address them effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.