ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2026
Implementing Diabetes Eating Problem Survey - Revised in pediatric type 1 diabetes care: Clinician reflections on systematic screening and multidisciplinary management.
Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimAdolescents with type 1 diabetes have an increased risk of disordered eating; however, these symptoms may be underrecognized by clinicians. The aim of this study was to explore clinicians' perspectives and experiences on implementing the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) as a screening tool for disordered eating in a multidisciplinary care setting at a pediatric diabetes clinic.
methodsA qualitative approach using Interpretive Description methodology was employed. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 clinicians, including pediatricians, nurses, dietitians, psychologists and psychiatrists.
resultsFour main themes were identified covering the relevance of DEPS-R as a supplement to the clinical expertise and intuition, enhancing conversations, interdisciplinary collaboration, engaging families and implementation challenges. Clinicians found DEPS-R valuable for detecting disordered eating, facilitating deeper patient conversations and supporting early intervention. Key challenges included time constraints and the need for further training.
conclusionsClinicians found DEPS-R to be a valuable addition to their practice for identifying disordered eating in youths with type 1 diabetes, but effective implementation requires interdisciplinary collaboration, management support and continuous optimization for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.