ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026
Effects of Cytotoxic Therapies on the Sperm Genome and Epigenome.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytotoxic therapies are widely used to treat malignant and non-malignant conditions, but they can exert adverse effects on the male germline. Spermatogenic cells are particularly vulnerable to these treatments due to their high proliferative activity and reduced capacity for DNA repair. Current evidence indicates that cytotoxic agents can induce molecular alterations in spermatozoa, affecting both the genome and the epigenome. At the genomic level, increased sperm DNA fragmentation, chromosomal abnormalities and, in some cases, stable sequence mutations have been observed, with variable persistence depending on treatment intensity and individual susceptibility. At the epigenetic level, cytotoxic exposures can disrupt DNA methylation patterns and alter the profile of microRNAs, a class of small non-coding RNAs crucial for spermatogenesis, fertilization, and early embryogenesis. Although only limited human data are available, studies indicate that persistent sperm epimutations may remain detectable long after treatment, raising concerns about potential impacts on offspring and, theoretically, transgenerational inheritance. Traditional parameters such as semen analysis and hormonal profiles are insufficient to detect these molecular alterations. Therefore, DNA integrity, DNA methylation signatures, and sperm-borne miRNAs are emerging as promising biomarkers for monitoring reproductive function following cytotoxic exposure. Fertility counselling, in particular semen cryopreservation prior to treatment, remains an essential component of clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42036609What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.