ReviewClinical & experimental metastasis2026
Redox processes in the treatment of advanced skin cancers.
Review in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) are central regulators of cellular processes, governing signaling, metabolism, and stress responses. The source of reactive species, together with the capacity of antioxidant networks, determines whether redox signals support cell survival or provoke cytotoxicity. Dysregulation of redox homeostasis promotes genomic instability, metabolic reprogramming, immune evasion, and therapy resistance, thereby contributing to tumor initiation and progression. Tumors further adapt their metabolism and antioxidant defenses, which changes their sensitivity to oxidative stress. Consequently, redox biology emerges as a highly promising target for intervention. This review focuses on topical ROS‑based strategies for advanced skin cancer, offering an overview of fundamental redox principles and evaluating both conventional topical agents (e.g., 5‑fluorouracil and imiquimod) and direct ROS-producing modalities (e.g., photodynamic therapy and medical gas plasma). Topical ROS‑based interventions can impose defined oxidative stress on tumors, combining direct tumoricidal activity with immunogenic effects. While standard agents rely primarily on antiproliferative or immune‑stimulatory mechanisms, pro‑oxidant therapies intentionally generate ROS/RNS to induce tumor cell death and stimulate antitumor immunity. They therefore may synergize with drugs that impair antioxidant defenses or sensitize cells to ferroptosis. Advanced cutaneous malignancies are suited to topical redox interventions because their surface accessibility permits localized treatment that addresses unmet therapeutic needs. To translate these opportunities, harmonized delivery and dosimetry, validated biomarkers for tumor redox phenotypes, and prospective trials integrating pharmacodynamic and safety endpoints are required to guide patient selection and combination strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42036545What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.