ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Clinical implications of false-negative and false-positive intraoperative transcranial motor evoked potentials in brain tumor surgery.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intraoperative monitoring of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (tc-MEPs) is widely used to detect disturbances of the motor function during brain tumor surgery. We analyzed false-positive and false-negative tc-MEP findings in consecutive institutional brain tumor surgery cases. A total of 342 patients who underwent brain tumor surgery with tc-MEP monitoring between January 2018 and September 2025 were retrospectively identified and analyzed. Intraoperative tc-MEP findings were compared with postoperative motor outcomes to assess concordance and discordance. False-positive and false-negative tc-MEP findings were defined based on the presence or absence of postoperative motor deficits during the immediate postoperative period and at 1 and 3 months after surgery. The cohort consisted of 170 men (49.7%) and 172 women (50.3%), with a median age of 60 years. Meningioma was the most common pathology, followed by glioma and metastatic brain tumors. Overall, 324 patients (94.7%) showed concordance between intraoperative tc-MEP findings and postoperative motor outcomes. Discordant findings were observed in 18 patients (5.26%), including 10 false-positive cases (2.92%) and 8 false-negative cases (2.34%). Exploratory analyses revealed that peri-rolandic tumor location was significantly associated with false-negative tc-MEP findings, whereas no clinical or tumor-related factors were significantly associated with false-positive events. tc-MEP monitoring demonstrated a high concordance rate with postoperative motor outcomes in brain tumor surgery. False-positive and false-negative findings occurred infrequently and were influenced by tumor location and perioperative factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42036515What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.