ArticleScientific reports2026
Mechanics-informed machine learning for predicting mechanical properties of heat-treated multi-metal alloys.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the mechanical behavior and damage evolution of heat-treated multi-metal alloys through an integrated framework combining machine learning and mechanics-based analysis. A comprehensive dataset comprising approximately 1500 alloy samples was analyzed to predict ultimate tensile strength (Su) using various regression models. Among the evaluated algorithms, XG Boost demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving a coefficient of determination of R2 = 0.98 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 44.26 MPa. To ensure model interpretability and physical consistency, SHAP (SHapley Additive ex-Planations) analysis was employed, revealing that shear modulus (G), Young’s modulus (E), elongation at fracture (A5), Brinell hardness (BHN), and yield strength (Sy) are the most influential parameters governing tensile strength. The results indicate that higher elastic and shear moduli significantly enhance Su, in agreement with fundamental mechanical principles. In addition, key mechanical responses including fatigue crack propagation, energy absorption capacity (up to 2420 J), fracture toughness (KIC ranging from 50 to 120 MPa m1/2), and surface hardness gradients were analyzed to provide a comprehensive understanding of deformation and failure mechanisms. The proposed approach offers a robust, physically interpretable, and data-driven tool for predicting and optimizing the mechanical performance of heat-treated metallic alloys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.