ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Optimization of an antifungal formulation based on eucalyptol, β-pinene, and α-terpinene against Candida albicans and Candida glabrata: A mixture design study.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to optimize a natural antifungal formulation comprising eucalyptol, β-pinene, and α-terpinene against Candida albicans, and Candida glabrata, two clinically relevant opportunistic fungal pathogens. These three monoterpenes, commonly found in essential oils of medicinal and aromatic plants, are recognized for their broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties, including notable antifungal activity. Prior to formulation studies, the physico-chemical profiles of the compounds were characterized, and an in silico toxicological assessment was conducted using predictive tools. All molecules were found to be safe, showing no potential for organ toxicity or adverse toxicological endpoints. An augmented simplex-centroid mixture design with three components was applied to evaluate twelve distinct formulations, enabling the analysis of compositional effects on antifungal efficacy, as determined by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values. The results demonstrated that the antifungal activity was formulation-dependent. For C. albicans, the MIC was significantly influenced by the individual contribution of eucalyptol (σ₁) and its binary interaction with β-pinene (σ₁₂) (p < 0.05). In contrast, for C. glabrata, the individual effects of all three components (σ₁, σ₂, σ₃) and their ternary interaction (σ₁₂₃) were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The fitted models showed high predictive accuracy, with determination coefficients (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
42036468What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.