ArticleScientific reports2026
Neuroimaging and machine learning fusion for improved brain tumor diagnosis and prognosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain diseases, including tumors, along with mental and neurological disorders, pose a substantial threat to millions of individuals worldwide. Doctors use both structural and functional neuroimaging methods for diagnosing these diseases. Specialist doctors often combine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with other neuroimaging techniques to enhance the detection and identification of brain diseases in clinical practice. This is crucial because these modalities give different information that supplement each other, hence enhancing accurate diagnosis. This study proposes a fusion approach integrating MRI with three Machine Learning (ML) classifiers, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), to improve brain tumor classification. Using a publicly available dataset containing 7023 MRI images across four categories (glioma, meningioma, pituitary, and no tumor), the models were trained and evaluated using a standard train-test split. The CNN model achieved the highest accuracy at 99.29%, followed by RF at 99.06% and SVM at 98.36%. While the performance metrics are promising, the study is limited to a single dataset and lacks external validation, which constrains the generalizability of results. Future work should explore clinical integration, federated learning frameworks, and multi-center datasets to enhance real-world applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.