Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42036445›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Enhancing internet of things intrusion detection through high-performance boosting ensemble learning.

Vitaliy Yakovyna, Anton Fadieiev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vitaliy YakovynaFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Michala Oczapowskiego str., 2, 10-719, Olsztyn, Poland.
Anton FadieievDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Kniazia Romana str., 5, 79905, Lviv, Ukraine. anton.fadieiev.mknus.2025@lpnu.ua.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the internet of things (IoT) has introduced significant security vulnerabilities, as traditional signature-based detection methods struggle to keep pace with evolving cyber threats. This study proposes a lightweight intrusion detection system (IDS) that leverages boosting ensemble learning to identify malicious traffic at the network edge. Using the large-scale Aposemat IoT-23 dataset, comprising over 25 million records, we performed extensive data preprocessing and exploratory data analysis to ensure statistical stability and address class imbalance. We evaluated several machine learning architectures, including logistic regression, Naïve Bayes, Random Forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM. Experimental results from five-fold cross-validation show that LightGBM outperforms other models, achieving 99.9% accuracy, F1 Score, and ROC AUC, with significantly lower training time of 612 s. Furthermore, confusion matrix analysis confirms that ensemble methods effectively minimize critical false negatives and false positives. These findings suggest that enhanced ensemble techniques provide a scalable, high-performance solution for real-time malware detection in resource-constrained IoT environments, bridging the gap between detection accuracy and computational efficiency.

Indexed as

Aposemat IoT-23BoostingClassificationEnsemble learningHigh-performance learningIntrusion detectionIoT networkLightGBMMachine learningMalicious traffic

Identifiers

PMID42036445
PMCPMC13284386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.