ArticleScientific reports2026
Unveiling the effects of printing parameters on the fracture behavior of 3D-printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene via the essential work of fracture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fused deposition modelling (FDM), a widely used 3D printing technique, is employed to fabricate acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) specimens, selected for its reliable printability and sensitivity to processing conditions. The flexibility of FDM enables precise control over printing parameters, providing an effective platform to examine their influence on fracture behaviour. In this study, the effects of layer height, nozzle diameter, and print speed are systematically investigated using the essential work of fracture (EWF) method, which separates crack-initiation and crack-propagation energy contributions. A full factorial design of experiments is implemented, revealing strong agreement between fracture responses and morphological observations, thereby linking microstructural features to governing fracture mechanisms. The results show that layer height and print speed are the most influential parameters. Reducing layer height increased tensile strength, tensile modulus, and crack-initiation resistance by approximately 15%, 11%, and 74%, respectively. Similarly, lower print speed improved these properties by about 6%, 4%, and 20%. Accordingly, optimal tensile and fracture performance was achieved at low layer height and low print speed, while nozzle diameter showed a comparatively minor effect. Conversely, higher layer height, higher print speed, and larger nozzle diameter enhanced ductility and crack-propagation resistance, highlighting a trade-off between strength-dominated and energy-dissipative fracture behaviour. These findings provide practical guidelines for tailoring fracture performance in FDM-printed ABS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.