Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42036430›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comfort evaluation of dog apparel using 3D virtual fitting with clothing pressure across body size, movement and fabric.

Jisoo Kim, Youngjoo Chae

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jisoo KimDepartment of Clothing & Textiles, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Korea.
Youngjoo ChaeDepartment of Clothing & Textiles, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Korea. ychae@cbnu.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2023-00278093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study qualitatively and quantitatively examined simulated clothing pressure in companion dogs as a function of body size, movement, and fabric type using the CLO 3D virtual fitting system. A vest-type garment was simulated for three dog body sizes (small, medium, and large), three movement types (sitting, walking, and running), and three fabric types (cotton, mesh, and padding). Clothing pressure was assessed at four body regions (neck, chest, back, and abdomen). Across the simulated conditions, clothing pressure generally increased in the order padding > mesh > cotton. Larger body sizes and more dynamic movements, particularly running, were associated with higher pressure, whereas sitting generally resulted in lower pressure. The chest and abdomen consistently showed relatively high-pressure areas within the simulation outputs, suggesting that these regions may warrant particular attention in future comfort-validation studies. While pressure maps enabled visual inspection of pressure distribution, discrepancies observed under certain conditions suggested that quantitative evaluation is necessary to support interpretation. Without conducting live-dog wear trials, this study demonstrates the feasibility of virtual clothing pressure assessment within the CLO 3D environment and highlights directions for improving pet-apparel simulations, including dog-specific avatars and motion presets, enhanced pressure-map visualization (e.g., zooming), real-time display of pressure values, and optional settings to account for fur-garment contact. Overall, the findings provide a simulation-based basis for comparative evaluation of pet apparel pressure and for informing future validation studies.

Indexed as

Body SizeClothingAnimalsDogsImaging, Three-DimensionalMovementPressureTextilesCLO 3DClothing comfortClothing pressurePetwearVirtual fitting

Identifiers

PMID42036430
PMCPMC13187249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.