ArticleEndocrine journal2026
Machine learning-based prediction of impaired arginine vasopressin secretion during hypertonic saline test.
Article in Endocrine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertonic saline infusion and water deprivation tests are commonly used to stimulate arginine vasopressin (AVP) for the diagnosis of AVP deficiency (AVP-D); however, these procedures impose a considerable burden on patients. We aimed to develop machine learning models to predict impaired AVP secretion and thereby reduce the need for AVP stimulation testing. This retrospective cohort study included 64 patients who underwent the hypertonic saline test (HST) at Nagoya University Hospital, Japan, between 2018 and 2024. Impaired AVP secretion was defined as a predicted plasma AVP level <1.0 pg/mL at a serum sodium level of 149 mEq/L during the HST. Feature selection was performed using univariate screening and systematic selection procedures. Logistic regression and support vector machine models were developed using baseline clinical and laboratory parameters obtained before the HST and validated using nested cross-validation. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC); secondary outcomes included the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Four variables (urinary osmolality, serum sodium, plasma AVP, and blood urea nitrogen) were selected. The logistic regression model achieved an AUC of 0.862 for predicting impaired AVP secretion. Among 35 patients who underwent the HST for suspected AVP-D, at the optimized threshold, the positive and negative predictive values were 100% (14/14 patients) and 33.3% (7/21 patients), respectively. The developed machine learning model can identify a subset of patients with impaired AVP secretion without requiring the HST, potentially reducing the number of patients who need AVP stimulation testing for AVP-D diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.