ReviewJournal of clinical nursing2026
Summary of Best Evidence for Noise Management in Neonatal Wards.
Review in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to retrieve, evaluate, and synthesize the best available evidence on noise management in neonatal wards to establish a foundational basis for implementing effective noise control practices.
methodsGuided by the "6S" evidence pyramid model, a systematic search was performed across multiple sources including clinical decision support systems, guideline repositories, professional websites, and major databases up to April 12, 2025. Literature types encompassed guidelines, evidence summaries, expert consensuses, and systematic reviews. Following quality appraisal, two researchers independently extracted and synthesized the evidence.
resultsSixteen publications were included: one guideline, six evidence summaries, six systematic reviews, and three expert consensuses. From these, 33 pieces of best evidence were synthesized and categorized into five key domains: noise sources, measurement techniques, threshold levels, reduction interventions, and clinical effects of noise.
conclusionsThis work provides a scientifically rigorous and comprehensive evidence summary for neonatal ward noise management, offering valuable guidance for clinical practice. Successful application requires adaptation to local contexts. Developing tailored, evidence-based implementation plans is recommended to bridge the evidence-practice gap and enhance neonatal outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Given neonates' heightened vulnerability, standardized noise management in the NICU is crucial. This summary provides clinicians with a robust, evidence-based framework to develop localized protocols. Its implementation is expected to improve the acoustic environment, thereby promoting physiological stability, supporting neurodevelopment, and reducing noise-related complications. REPORTING
methodThis evidence summary followed the reporting specifications of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-Based Nursing (Joanna Briggs Institute methodology) and was registered (ES20257726). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.