ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2026
Comparative Response of Canine and Human Osteosarcoma Tumour Cell Lines to Molecularly Targeted Anticancer Agents at Clinically Relevant Exposures With Analysis of Genomic Biomarkers.
Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteosarcoma (OSA) is a primary bone tumour occurring in children but is also prevalent in large breed dogs. Canine OSA (cOSA) has long been viewed as analogous to human OSA (hOSA) with cOSA serving as a surrogate for development of therapeutic approaches to treat the rarer human form. Drug therapy of OSA has remained virtually unchanged over the last four decades and drug testing is challenging due to the genomic heterogeneity of OSA as well as the limited number of patients for clinical trials. Thus, an approach that includes a suitable clinical surrogate at the early stage of therapeutic development may be beneficial. Therefore, to address these challenges, a phenotypic drug screen of 12 targeted anticancer drugs was carried out using 13 cOSA and 6 hOSA cell lines and responses compared at clinically relevant exposures (CRE) estimated from human data. The results identified four drugs (alisertib, crizotinib, onvansertib and sorafenib) with significant responses at the CRE in cOSA and hOSA cell lines and demonstrated that drug responses were indistinguishable across species. Correlations of drug response with genomic biomarkers in the cOSA cell line panel identified Myc and Hedgehog signalling as potential predictors of crizotinib response and Myc, epithelial markers and anti-apoptotic signalling for onvansertib response. The conclusions of these findings are that cOSA and hOSA cell lines show the same range of response to targeted agents and identify potential biomarker pathways for further investigation in OSA tumours for use in future comparative oncology studies including clinical trials in pet dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.