ReviewMolecules and cells2026
Brain-inspired strategies for efficient artificial intelligence.
Review in Molecules and cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite being constrained by a rigid skull and a fixed number of neurons, the brain excels in processing diverse information and making adaptive decisions with remarkable efficiency. This raises a central question at the intersection of neuroscience and artificial intelligence (AI): How does the brain achieve such high performance with limited physical resources? We addressed this question by examining the anatomical funneling architecture of the basal ganglia, a central hub for value-based decision-making. Through parallel processing, distinct circuits support cognitive flexibility and habitual stability, enabling efficient allocation of neural resources and context-sensitive engagement in specialized computations. In contrast, convergent processing compresses the input across circuits, allowing the efficient extraction of core information for decision-making, a form of quantitative efficiency that minimizes the number of neurons required. However, this compression can degrade the fidelity. To address this, the brain employs qualitative efficiency in which population-level neural patterns preserve fine-grained information and support generalization across similar contexts. Finally, we propose that the cortico-basal ganglia system achieves cognitive efficiency by funneling the anatomical structure and dimensionality reduction to optimize both performance and energy demands. These principles offer a biologically grounded framework for developing brain-inspired, resource-efficient artificial intelligence systems that balance generalization with precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.