ArticleJournal of substance use and addiction treatment2026
"Smart" harm reduction vending machines to improve public health: Evaluating the utilization.
Article in Journal of substance use and addiction treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Harm reduction vending machines as safer supply-supporting infrastructure.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLow-barrier methods, including vending machines (VMs), for dispensing harm reduction (HR) items have become popular in the United States. Technological advances have enabled VM's advanced features (e.g., interactive touchscreens, client registration, cloud-based data collection). This report describes the evaluation outcomes from two "smart" VMs (sVMs) in community settings with the goal of reducing harms related to substance use, especially opioids.
methodsTwo sVMs, placed in central Pennsylvania's communities (one outside an urban hospital's emergency department; another inside a community organization's lobby in a small city), dispensed free HR items and provided information on, and linkages to, healthcare, social welfare, and other community services. Data on sVM utilization, collected from May 2024 to May 2025, were analyzed using descriptive statistics; test of proportions was used to compare the data across the two sites.
resultsOver one year, 2321 clients accessed the two sVMs, with an additional 4472 sessions with non-registered individuals viewing items or resources. The sVMs dispensed 11,327 items to 2321 registered clients, with hygiene kits (n = 3454), wound care kits (n = 1674), and safer sex kits (n = 1553) being most common. The sVMs dispensed 2755 drug testing strips and 1906 naloxone doses. Furthermore, 396 registered clients obtained information on existing resources/services. Across a total of 14,867 sessions, significant differences in usage were noted between the two sVMs.
conclusionsInteractive sVMs can effectively dispense HR items and connect individuals to services, thereby having the potential to improve individual and public health. Contextual factors, such as location, may influence utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.