ArticleSalud colectiva2026
Lay knowledge and epistemic justice in mental health: a critical analysis of the peer support worker in the Spanish State.
Article in Salud colectiva, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This essay critically examines the figure of the peer support worker within the mental health system of the Spanish State as a dispositif situated in the tension between the transformation of epistemic hierarchies and the risk of institutional co-optation. Drawing on our experiences and research in the field of critical medical anthropology and human rights in mental health, together with and from the activisms of the Mad Movement in the Spanish State, we analyse how this professional figure simultaneously embodies a promise of epistemic power redistribution and the danger of neutralisation by the hegemonic biomedical model. We argue that epistemic justice in mental health requires the radical transformation of the material, relational, and institutional conditions that have historically sustained the delegitimation of experiential knowledge. Through a genealogical analysis of the peer support worker and its processes of institutionalisation, we identify the structural conditions that determine whether its incorporation can effectively challenge dominant regimes of truth or, conversely, operates as a mechanism of legitimation that formally incorporates diversity without transforming existing logics of power. We conclude by proposing a framework of four dimensions of political intervention: strengthening epistemic fraternities and Mad Movement networks as community assets, transforming professional cultures, contesting regulatory frameworks, and articulating local processes of knowledge co-production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.