ArticleBMC psychology2026
Thinking versus doing: how congruency between cognitive and actional future orientation affects left-behind children's life satisfaction.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMillions of children are left behind in rural areas of China while their parents work in urban areas, placing them at heightened risk for poor mental health outcomes. Future orientation, comprising cognitive and actional dimensions, has been identified as a potential protective factor for vulnerable youth. However, the relationship between the congruence of these two dimensions and psychological adjustment remains unexplored among left-behind children. This study aimed to investigate both cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between the congruency of cognitive and actional future orientation with life satisfaction among Chinese left-behind children.
methodsA sample of 1,485 left-behind children (720 girls; mean age = 13.49 years) was recruited from rural areas in Henan and Sichuan provinces, China. A subset of 459 participants completed follow-up assessments one year later. Cognitive and actional future orientation were measured using the Questionnaire for Teenagers’ Future Orientation, and life satisfaction was assessed using the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Polynomial regression with response surface analysis was employed to examine both congruence and discrepancy effects.
resultsOver half (56.79%) of participants exhibited discrepancies between cognitive and actional future orientation. Response surface analysis revealed a significant linear relationship between congruence of cognitive and actional future orientation with life satisfaction, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. In contrast, a non-linear relationship emerged between discrepancy and life satisfaction: as incongruence increased, life satisfaction decreased. Notably, higher actional future orientation combined with lower cognitive future orientation was associated with greater life satisfaction than the reverse pattern. Longitudinal analyses further demonstrated that synchronous development of both dimensions predicted enhanced life satisfaction, while asynchronous development was associated with diminished well-being.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the importance of considering both the magnitude and direction of discrepancies between cognitive and actional future orientation when examining psychological adjustment in left-behind children. The results suggest that interventions should focus not only on fostering future-oriented thinking but also on developing concrete action planning skills to promote life satisfaction among this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.