ArticleBiology of sex differences2026
Capturing sex differences in spontaneous autonomic fluctuations of resting heart rate using a similarity graph theory approach.
Article in Biology of sex differences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutonomic control of the heart is an important indicator of self-regulation and overall mental and physical health. The vagus nerve plays a central role in this regulation, and resting-state heart rate variability (HRV), reflecting fluctuations in inter-beat intervals (IBIs), is the primary noninvasive marker of vagal activity. As males and females differ in aspects of self-regulation, HRV may help elucidate underlying neurobiological differences. However, sex differences in commonly used HRV metrics, such as natural log transformed root mean square of successive RR interval differences (lnRMSSD) and high-frequency HRV (lnHF-HRV) derived from 5-minute recordings, appear smaller in young adults than in other age groups. These metrics capture vagally mediated activity as averaged linear measures and may therefore overlook rapid, spontaneous IBI fluctuations. In the present study, we tested whether a similarity graph theory algorithm could better capture sex differences in nonlinear, rapid IBI variability within 2-5-seconds time windows.
methodsElectrocardiogram (ECG) recordings of 269 young, healthy adults between 18 and 30 years old (M = 21.5, SD = 3.0) were pooled from three different studies. Males accounted for 52.4% of participants, indicating a comparable distribution between sexes. Similarity graph-theory metrics were computed to quantify nonlinear, rapid interbeat interval (IBI) variability using sliding windows of 2-5 s and ≥12 s. In addition, conventional linear and nonlinear heart rate variability metrics, including lnRMSSD and lnHF-HRV, were calculated. Logistic regression models were used to assess the predictive value of graph-theory and HRV metrics for sex, both separately and in combined models for comparison. All models were adjusted for age, body mass index, mean heart rate, and respiratory rate.
resultsMales showed higher graph-metric values, indicating lower IBI variability compared with females (odds ratio 2.78; 95% CI 1.32-5.86). Neither lnRMSSD nor lnHF-HRV distinguished sexes alone; however, lnRMSSD became predictive when combined with the graph metric (odds ratio 1.73; 95% CI 1.06-2.81), although this effect was attenuated after controlling for mean heart rate.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that nonlinear methods sensitive to rapid spontaneous IBI changes can complement traditional short-term HRV metrics for assessing sex differences in autonomic heart regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.