ArticleBMC psychology2026
Psychosocial impact of acne among medical, Speech and Hearing Sciences, and Occupational Therapy undergraduates at a Sri Lankan University.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcne vulgaris is associated with substantial psychosocial effects, including impaired socioemotional well-being among young adults. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of acne and to examine the relationships and predictive effects of acne-related quality of life on psychological distress and self-esteem, in addition to exploring gender differences among medical and allied health undergraduates.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from April to June 2025 among undergraduates aged 18–28 years from three degree programmes: Medicine (MBBS), Speech and Hearing Sciences (SHS), and Occupational Therapy (OT) at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. At this Faculty, SHS and OT are the only allied health undergraduate programmes; therefore, these were the allied health disciplines included. The participants were recruited via convenience sampling via a self-administered online questionnaire with three validated psychometric tools: The Acne Quality of Life Questionnaire (Acne-QoL), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). Data analysis was performed in SPSS v22, employing descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, linear regression and Pearson correlation. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05 for chi-square and regression analyses, and a more stringent significance level of p ≤ 0.001 was used for correlation analyses. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya (No: P/12/02/2025). The study period coincided with a post-pandemic phase of normalized on-campus activity, providing relevant psychosocial context for undergraduate life.
resultsA total of 480 undergraduates completed the survey (361 females, 119 males). Among all respondents, 398 reported having acne, with prevalence significantly higher in females (87.0%) than in males (70.6%) (p < 0.05). In accordance with predefined criteria, 109 respondents (23%) were excluded: 82 (17%) who did not have acne and 27 (6%) who reported a pre-existing diagnosed psychological disorder. The final analytical sample therefore comprised 371 participants with acne (79% female; mean age 23.9 years). The Pearson correlation analysis revealed very strong positive correlations among the four Acne-QoL domain demonstrated a moderate positive correlation with overall self-esteem (r = 0.424 to 0.519, all p < 0.001), with the role social domain correlating most strongly with self-esteem (r = 0.519, p < 0.001). Significant negative correlations were found between all four Acne-QoL domains and the following psychological distress measures: anxiety, depression, and stress (p < 0.001). Linear regression revealed that the acne symptoms domain was a positive and significant predictor of self-esteem (B = 0.154, β = 0.221, p = 0.006), whereas the role social domain was the strongest positive predictor (B = 0.420, β = 0.615, p < 0.001). Conversely, the role emotional domain negatively predicted self-esteem (B = -0.176, β = -0.314, p = 0.030). The acne symptoms domain is a significant negative predictor of depression (B = -0.139, β = 0.209, p = 0.017). Similarly, the role social domain also significantly negatively predicts depression (B = -0.218, β = -0.333, p = 0.013). For anxiety, the acne symptoms domain score was also a significant negative predictor (B = -0.204, β = -0.320, p < 0.001). For stress, the acne symptoms domain also showed a significant negative association (B = -0.163, β = -0.259, p = 0.004). Gender differences emerged in the depression and stress models: females reported lower depression and stress scores related to social roles but higher scores related to emotional roles (all p < 0.05).
conclusionsThis study highlights the significant psychosocial impact of acne among medical and allied health undergraduates, underscoring the importance of holistic care that addresses both dermatological and mental health needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.