ArticleBMC nutrition2026
How are vegetable gardens used, managed and resourced in Australian primary schools? A mixed-methods study.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing equitable and sustainable school-based nutrition interventions.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSchool gardens are an effective strategy to increase food literacy and to promote healthy eating and environmental health. However, barriers such as inadequate funding, time and training mean that many schools are not able to implement or properly utilise a school garden program. The aim of this study was to examine how school gardens are used, managed, and resourced in Australian primary schools.
methodsA mixed-methods approach was used, with 111 Australian primary school staff completing an online survey and 13 Victorian primary school teachers participating in a one-on-one interview. The survey included both closed and open-ended questions and an exploratory analysis was conducted with frequencies being reported for key variables. The semi-structured interviews were coded into themes and subthemes based on the interview questions.
resultsNinety per cent of survey participants worked at schools with a food garden, but how they were used and how effectively utilised they were, varied. Responsibility for managing and maintaining the garden was primarily the role of students and classroom teachers in most schools, with some also relying heavily on volunteers. Healthy eating and environmental sustainability were key focus areas of most garden programs, while they also provided learning opportunities for important life and social skills. However, many teachers reported that the garden was not well-integrated into the curriculum. While lack of time and funding were the most commonly reported barriers to effective garden programs, many schools demonstrated resilience by utilising existing community connections and incorporating sustainable practices that reduce costs.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates how school gardens are used, managed and resourced in Australian primary schools. The findings indicate that targeted teacher training, leadership support, community involvement and innovative cost-reducing strategies, could help to maximise the effectiveness of school garden programs. Future research should focus on exploring how the school system can be supported to develop policies and frameworks that enable schools to maintain and expand garden initiatives, as well as determining how different policies, climates and cultural contexts influence school gardens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.