ArticleBMC health services research2026
Disaster management in Türkiye: a qualitative study on healthcare professionals.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisasters pose complex challenges that extend beyond immediate emergency response, requiring well-coordinated, resilient, and health-centered disaster management systems. In disaster-prone countries such as Türkiye, understanding how health services, particularly specialized medical rescue teams, function in real disaster settings is critical for identifying systemic gaps and improving preparedness, coordination, and response capacity. The aim of this study is to examine the managerial and organizational challenges encountered in disaster management processes based on the experiences of UMKE personnel who have served during various disasters in Türkiye, and to derive implications for strengthening disaster preparedness and response capacity.
methodsThe study was conducted using a qualitative research design. In-depth interviews were carried out with healthcare professionals who participated in disaster response. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and the findings were categorized into five main themes: shortages of logistics and equipment; working conditions and training; social awareness; lack of coordination, communication, and organization; and institutional structure and local empowerment.
resultsThe findings revealed that road damages hindered transportation and that alternative transportation plans were inadequate. Disaster training were not fully adapted to field conditions. Public disaster literacy was found to be low. Insufficient coordination and communication disrupted interventions. In addition, the study identified psychosocial support, community-based education, and institutional capacity building as critical components of effective disaster management.
conclusionsThis study was designed to capture the personal perspectives of healthcare professionals who directly confronted disasters and gained first-hand experience of related processes. Therefore, it provides a unique contribution by presenting a disaster management framework through the lens of healthcare professionals and by highlighting areas in need of improvement for policymakers in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.