ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026
Negotiating existential conflicts in later life: an empirically informed analysis of gender and age in psychotherapy with older adults.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis article explores the intersection between age and gender in a psychotherapeutic context with older adults through an existential lens. While awareness of gender- and age-related biases in mental health care is growing, their combined effects and the normative implications for clinical practice remain underexplored. The existential perspective allows psychological symptoms and personal struggles to be understood in relation to the fundamental conditions of human existence, against the backdrop of this intersection and broader structural conditions.
methodsA secondary qualitative analysis of written psychotherapeutic session protocols from 13 patients aged 60–80 years in psychiatric care was conducted using Kuckartz’s qualitative content analysis. The analysis examined case-based and cross-case patterns to explore potential links between gendered experiences and the negotiation of existential conflicts in later life, thereby generating gender-sensitive hypotheses that may be relevant for clinical practice.
resultsThe analysis suggests that structurally gendered conditions, such as economic dependency, the role of professional identity, the amount of involvement in care work, or masculine norms of strength and decisiveness, are linked to how existential conflicts are experienced and negotiated in later life. It offers a basis for hypotheses about how gendered experiences shape encounters with mortality, dependency, and guilt, as well as the resources available for addressing them.
conclusionsExistential conflicts in later life can be shaped by gendered patterns of experience that influence both the challenges older patients face and the resources they have for engaging with them. An existential perspective complements intersectional approaches by illuminating how structural and fundamentally human dimensions can coalesce in shaping such experiences. This perspective is clinically significant because it draws clinicians’ attention to often overlooked but important patient concerns and supports self-awareness and the development of authentic coping strategies that promote personal growth.
trial registrationThe study was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00023139, 16th November 2020).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.