ArticleBMC health services research2026
Bridging ethical and governance gaps in digital health: insights from users and startups in Iran.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital health adoption is accelerating in many low- and middle-income countries, yet governance, ethical safeguards, and data stewardship often lag behind technological uptake. This mismatch can undermine user trust, service quality, and the long-term sustainability of digital health innovations. This study aimed to identify and conceptualize key governance gaps influencing the development of Iran’s digital health ecosystem.
methodsA qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using 18 semi-structured interviews with policymakers, entrepreneurs, and healthcare professionals, alongside content analysis of 700 user comments extracted from major Iranian digital health platforms. Data were analyzed through the six-phase framework of Braun and Clarke, combining inductive (data-driven) and deductive (theory-informed) coding. Triangulation between interview and user datasets enhanced validity, and the COREQ checklist guided reporting.
resultsSix interrelated governance gaps were identified: (1) Regulatory and Oversight Gap – fragmented authorities and lack of unified licensing; (2) Ethical and Trust Gap – weak accountability and declining user confidence; (3) Data Governance Gap – unclear data ownership and poor privacy protection; (4) Quality and Standardization Gap – lack of evaluation indicators and accreditation systems; (5) Institutional Capacity Gap – limited expertise and low readiness for digital transformation; and (6) Economic and Sustainability Gap – insufficient financial incentives and policy support. Findings from user comments confirmed that governance weaknesses directly affect satisfaction, perceived fairness, and trust in digital health services.
conclusionsDigital health in emerging settings requires a multi-level governance approach that aligns national policy, institutional regulation, and operational accountability. We propose an integrated macro–meso–micro governance model with cross-cutting principles (transparency, responsibility and data integrity, participation, trust) to guide policymakers and platform operators. Strengthening a unified regulator, a national ethics charter for digital health, and a health data governance framework are priority actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.