Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42035090›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2026

The interactions between geriatric nutritional risk index and systemic immune-inflammation index for post-recurrence prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study.

Teruhisa Sakamoto, Kentaro Uehira, Jun Yoshida, Mikiya Kishino, Masaki Morimoto, Yuki Murakami, Kozo Miyatani, Yuji Shishido, Kyoichi Kihara, Tomoyuki Matsunaga and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Teruhisa SakamotoDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nichi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan. tesakamo@tottori-u.ac.jp.
Kentaro UehiraDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nichi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Jun YoshidaDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nichi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Mikiya KishinoDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nichi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Masaki MorimotoDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nichi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Yuki MurakamiDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nichi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Kozo MiyataniDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nichi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Yuji ShishidoDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nichi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Kyoichi KiharaDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nichi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Tomoyuki MatsunagaDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nichi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Manabu YamamotoDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nichi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Naruo TokuyasuDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nichi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Yoshiyuki FujiwaraDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nichi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNutritional status and systemic immune-inflammatory activity reflect dynamic interactions between tumor biology and host response and are closely implicated in cancer progression. However, the comparative prognostic utility of nutritional and immune-inflammatory indices in the post-recurrence setting of pancreatic cancer remains unclear. This study investigated the prognostic interaction between established nutritional and immune-inflammatory markers in patients with recurrent pancreatic cancer following pancreatectomy.

methodsA total of 120 patients who developed recurrence following pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Nutritional status was assessed using serum albumin, the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI). Immune-inflammatory status was evaluated using the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). The prognostic significance of these indices for post-recurrence survival was examined, and their discriminative performance was compared.

resultsAmong the nutritional markers, the GNRI demonstrated the highest discriminative ability for post-recurrence survival, while the SII showed the strongest performance among immune-inflammatory indicators. Both GNRI and SII were significantly associated with survival after recurrence. Stratification based on the combined GNRI and SII classification revealed that the integrated model provided superior prognostic discrimination compared with either marker alone. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the combined GNRI–SII classification was an independent prognostic factor in patients with recurrent pancreatic cancer (p = 0.005).

conclusionsPatients presenting with a low GNRI and high SII at the time of recurrence experienced significantly poorer survival compared with other combinatorial groups. The combined assessment of GNRI and SII represents a practical and potentially valuable tool for prognostic stratification and may assist in guiding optimal therapeutic decision-making in recurrent pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentInflammationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedNeutrophilsGNRIPancreatic cancerRecurrenceSII

Identifiers

PMID42035090
PMCPMC13248381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.