ArticleBMC cancer2026
Risk of colorectal cancer by socioeconomic position and history of mental illness - a national nested case-control study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimWhether socioeconomic factors are associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk remains unknown, with inconsistent results from different countries. The hypothesis was that both socioeconomic factors and the presence of psychiatric comorbidities are risk factors for CRC.
methodCRCBaSe, a registry linkage project, was used for a nested case‒control study with 78,043 CRC patients and 431,105 controls matched by age, sex, and county of residence. Socioeconomic factors (income, education, civil status, and birth country) and history of mental illness were used to obtain incidence rate ratios (hazard ratios).
resultsPatients in the middle-income quartile had an increased rate of CRC compared with those in the lowest-income quartile (HR 1.05, 95%CI 1.03–1.08 for Q2 vs. Q1, and HR 1.04 95%CI 1.021.07 for Q3 vs. Q1), whereas there was no association with high income or educational level. Compared with those born in Sweden, those born in other Nordic countries had an increased rate of CRC (HR 1.06 95%CI 1.02–1.10), and those born outside of the EU had a decreased rate (HR 0.80 95%CI 0.77–0.83). A history of mental illness was associated with the rate of CRC even after adjusting for socioeconomic factors: mild mental illness, HR 0.81 (95%CI 0.78–0.83); and severe mental illness, HR 1.85 (95%CI 1.74–1.96).
conclusionThese findings confirm that the effect of socioeconomic position on CRC risk is heterogeneous and small in Sweden and that severe mental illness is a separate risk factor. Further investigations into the mechanisms that drive the increased risk of CRC in patients with mental illness are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.