Observational studyBMC nephrology2026
The value of pleth variability index in predicting hypotension during maintenance hemodialysis: a prospective observational multicenter study (PVi-HD study).
Observational study in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a frequent and serious complication of hemodialysis, and existing prediction tools are inadequate. The Pleth Variability Index (PVi), a non-invasive dynamic parameter that reflects cardiorespiratory interactions and fluid responsiveness, has shown promise in acute care settings, but its value in hemodialysis remains unexplored. We prospectively assessed PVi and its dynamic changes as predictors of IDH in a multicenter maintenance hemodialysis cohort.
methodsIn this prospective, multicenter observational study, we enrolled 200 patients on chronic hemodialysis. PVi was measured at baseline (PVi baseline) and 60 min into the session (PVi 1 h). We calculated the absolute change (ΔPVi) and percentage change (ΔPVi%). The primary outcome was the predictive performance of these parameters for IDH, assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors.
resultsIDH occurred in 61 patients (30.5%). While baseline PVi was similar between groups, PVi 1 h, ΔPVi, and ΔPVi% were all significantly higher in patients who developed IDH (all P < 0.001). Dynamic PVi parameters demonstrated excellent predictive value, with ΔPVi showing the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) at 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78-0.89). Followed closely by ΔPVi% (AUC 0.83), for which the optimal cutoff of 23.53% yielded a sensitivity of 78.69% and a specificity of 74.82% for predicting IDH. These significantly outperformed traditional predictors, including baseline mean arterial pressure (AUC 0.71) and ultrafiltration volume (AUC 0.68) (all P < 0.001 for comparison). In multivariate logistic regression, both ΔPVi% (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03) and ΔPVi (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.16-1.28) were identified as robust independent predictors for IDH (both P < 0.001). This association was held in a sensitivity analysis using a more stringent definition of IDH based on symptomatic episodes. Using an optimal cutoff, Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with a ΔPVi% > 23.53% had a 7.15-fold higher risk of developing IDH (HR 7.15, 95% CI 3.86-13.22).
conclusionsDynamic changes in PVi during the first hour of hemodialysis are strong, independent predictors of subsequent IDH. Monitoring PVi changes offers a promising and practical non-invasive tool for early risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.