Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42035005›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2026

Soil environmental changes drive root decomposition under acid and nitrogen deposition in Chinese fir plantation, China.

Xuanran Yu, Chang Pan, Jinchi Zhang, Xingyu Zhang, Aodeng Rong, Qingguo Tong, Xiongfei Zhang, Chong Li, Hui Nie, Jingyi Zeng and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xuanran YuCo-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu Province, Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4296-3355
Chang PanState Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jinchi ZhangCo-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu Province, Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China. zhang8811@njfu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0517-7214
Xingyu ZhangCo-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu Province, Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Aodeng RongInner Mongolia Big Data Center, Hohhot, 010090, China.
Qingguo TongCNBM Mining Investment (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China.
Xiongfei ZhangCo-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu Province, Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9285-9038
Chong LiDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9330-5396
Hui NieCo-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu Province, Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2980-8815
Jingyi ZengCo-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu Province, Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Yangyang WangCo-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu Province, Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Xin LiuCo-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu Province, Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China. liuxinswc@njfu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8641-7170

Funding

Jiangsu·Province Science Foundation for·Youths BK20200785Jiangsu Science and Technology Plan Project BE2022420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decomposition of underground roots is a crucial component of soil carbon turnover and nutrient input processes. However, our understanding of how root chemistry and soil environments interact during root decomposition remains limited, and differences in the decomposition processes among different root orders are still unclear. Therefore, this study was conducted using Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) as the experimental subject. We combine root chemistry-only change, soil environment-only change, and in-situ experiments to investigate the effects of root chemistry and soil environments during root decomposition, as well as the differences in decomposition processes among different root orders under the context of acid rain and nitrogen deposition. Our findings indicate that the soil environment has a long-term and more significant influence on root decomposition. In the SHAP analysis of relative contributions, soil environmental factors explained 61.2% of the variation in low-order roots and 55.9% of the variation in high-order roots. The root decomposition process primarily shifts from being dominated by root chemistry in the short term to being governed by the soil environment in the long term. Different root orders show similar changing trends but differ in their timing of change: for low-order, the dominant factor shifts to the soil environment after 6 months, whereas for high-order, this shift occurs after 10 months. The influence of the soil environment is mediated through soil nutrient. For instance, high-order roots are primarily driven by the soil carbon-nitrogen ratio, with a direct effect of 0.38, while low-order roots are dominated by available potassium, with a direct effect of 0.57. Interestingly, under the context of acid rain and nitrogen deposition, soil environment and root chemistry showed a synergistically enhancing trend in inhibiting the decomposition of low-order roots, whereas for high-order roots, the two factors exhibited an opposite trend of mutually weakening inhibition. In summary, this study highlights the long-term importance of the soil environment in root decomposition and the varying responses of different root orders, contributing to a deeper understanding of root decomposition and soil carbon turnover processes in forest ecosystems.

Indexed as

Acid RainCunninghamiaNitrogenPlant RootsSoilCarbonChinaAcid RainCarbonNitrogenSoilAcid rainNitrogen depositionRoot chemistrySoil environment

Identifiers

PMID42035005
PMCPMC13251174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.