Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42034913›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Deep learning-based double-sided fudge detection system with integrated physical components.

Yuan-Hsun Liao, Hsiao-Hui Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuan-Hsun LiaoDepartment of Computer Science, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hsiao-Hui LiDepartment of Maritime Information and Technology, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. xiasohui@nkust.edu.tw.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), Taiwan NSTC 111-2622-E-029-004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposes an automated defect detection system for large-scale fudge production, addressing the limitations of manual inspection, which is both labor-intensive and error-prone. Deep learning-based image recognition was employed to classify normal samples and four defect types using multiple object detection models, including SSD and YOLOv4/YOLOv5/YOLOv7/YOLOv8/YOLOv11. Instead of relying on a single model, the system integrates a multi-model strategy combining confidence-weighted voting, rule-based selection for specific defects, and Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS), enabling complementary strengths across models and improving robustness. The selected models were deployed in a real-time inspection system equipped with a flipping mechanism that allows each piece of fudge to be inspected on both sides, thereby expanding the coverage of defects. In evaluations using 1,000 real production samples, first-round accuracies were 47.5% (hole), 56.7% (leak), and 60.9% (white). After applying the flipping mechanism for a second inspection, accuracies increased to 75.8%, 83.6%, and 89.3%, respectively, with hole defects showing the largest improvement (28.3%). Our validation-learned fusion achieves 0.995 mAP@0.5 (on par with the best single model) and 0.944 mAP@0.5:0.95, outperforming YOLOv11 and YOLOv5 by + 0.2 and + 2.4 percentage points, respectively; gains are most evident for White defect and Hole defect. These results indicate that combining multi-model detection with dual-side inspection significantly enhances accuracy and enables the reliable screening of defects in real-time production environments.

Indexed as

Deep learningDefect detectionFood safetyImage recognition

Identifiers

PMID42034913
PMCPMC13284246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.