ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Integrating multimodal clinical data with a large model for prostate cancer diagnosis.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-driven precision diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis remains difficult because of tumor heterogeneity and the challenge of integrating multimodal clinical information. We developed Prost-LM, a multimodal large language model that jointly embeds MRI-derived features, numerical PSA values, and free-text clinical reports into a unified semantic space to enable deep cross-modal reasoning. Trained and validated on a large multi-center cohort of 3940 patients, Prost-LM achieved strong diagnostic performance, with an internal validation AUC of 0.954 for distinguishing PCa from benign conditions, outperforming MRI-only models (AUC = 0.868, P < 0.001). For detecting clinically significant PCa (Gleason score ≥ 7), Prost-LM reached an AUC of 0.955. Additionally, the model provides interpretable diagnostic decisions to support clinical verification. These results suggest Prost-LM can improve automated PCa diagnosis and support precision oncology through multimodal AI.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.