ArticleScientific reports2026
Differential associations between subjective and objective physical activity and memory across adulthood: a specification curve analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies yield mixed findings on the relationship between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and episodic memory, potentially due to differences in measurement type (subjective or objective) or variable selection (total MVPA or number of MVPA bouts). To examine this issue, we assessed the association between MVPA and memory with subjective self-report measures (International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire, Cognitive Change Index) and objective measures (actigraphy, standardized memory tests) in 172 participants (18–86 years, mean age = 55.4 years). Exploratory specification curve analysis was used to assess the relationship between MVPA and memory across operationalizations while mitigating potential researcher bias in the selection of model specifications. Objectively measured percentage of day in MVPA was positively associated with objective memory performance, whereas subjective MVPA was not associated with subjective or objective memory. Time spent in MVPA bouts was positively related to self-reported memory abilities, and number of MVPA bouts was negatively associated with objective verbal episodic memory performance. Findings did not vary by age. The differential relationships across measurement types suggest that subjective and objective measures and their various operationalizations capture distinct aspects of MVPA and memory, emphasizing the importance of measurement choices and caution when comparing results using differing methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.