ReviewJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2026
New histopathological terminology for well-differentiated hepatocellular lesions in unusual clinico-pathological scenarios: HCA-like and FNH-like.
Review in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integration of histopathology and molecular features for the classification of benign and malignant hepatocellular neoplasms.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lines defining Hepatocellular Adenoma (HCA) and Focal Nodular Hyperplasia (FNH) can be blurred when they occur outside their prototypical clinico-pathological contexts. A terminology going beyond HCA and FNH with comments on possible malignant potential, the status of the background liver and/or underlying unusual clinical scenario is thereby justified. Indeed, both more sophisticated contrast-enhanced characterization and the identification of specific immunohistochemical and molecular markers for well-differentiated hepatocellular lesions have enabled a greater understanding of their presentation and biology. The traditional concepts of HCA and FNH occurring in livers that are "otherwise histologically normal or near normal" has given way to understanding that these lesions can also occur in livers affected by chronic liver conditions. When this is the case, morpho-molecular overlap exists between the two entities. Hence, it is now necessary to set a new approach for HCA and FNH, considering not only their intrinsic morphologic and molecular features, but also the background liver in which they are arising, and the clinical context in which they are occurring. The dichotomous paradigm of benign vs. malignant also becomes more nuanced. To raise the diagnostic uncertainty in unusual clinico-pathological scenarios, the International Liver Pathology Study Group suggests designating these lesions as well-differentiated hepatocellular lesions, HCA-like (and subtype when applicable) or FNH-like. This nuanced terminology enables pathologists to highlight these outliers to the hepatobiliary multidisciplinary team that will adapt the clinical management accordingly. It also provides a framework for further collaborative studies. In conclusion, we propose a more nuanced terminology, beyond conventional HCA and FNH, to consider, alongside histological and molecular features, abnormalities in the background liver and unusual clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.