ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Grayscale ultrasound radiomics for characterizing subpleural pulmonary lesions: a multicenter prospective study.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and validate a radiomics model based on grayscale ultrasound (GSUS) images for characterizing subpleural pulmonary lesions (SPLs). MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this prospective, multicenter study, 738 patients with CT-confirmed SPLs were enrolled from three institutions and assigned to training (n = 407), internal validation (n = 146), and external validation (n = 185) cohorts. A total of 1320 radiomics features were extracted from both lesion and perilesional regions on GSUS images. Feature selection was performed through intra- and inter-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) analyses, Pearson correlation analyses, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Clinical-radiomics fusion models were subsequently constructed by integrating selected radiomics features with key clinical variables using multivariate logistic regression. Model performance was evaluated comprehensively using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and additional diagnostic metrics.
resultsFive predictive models were constructed based on clinical, radiologic, and radiomics features. Among them, the integrated model combining lesion-based radiomics with clinical variables achieved the best diagnostic performance, with AUCs of 0.884 (95% CI: 0.828-0.940) in the internal validation cohort and 0.848 (95% CI: 0.791-0.904) in the external validation cohort. Calibration and decision curve analyses demonstrated good model calibration and favorable clinical utility. The diagnostic accuracy of the model was comparable to that of experienced lung ultrasound radiologists.
conclusionsThe GSUS-based radiomics model effectively differentiates between benign and malignant SPLs, demonstrating strong diagnostic performance and promising clinical applicability. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The proposed ultrasound-based radiomics model provides a reproducible, noninvasive decision-support tool for characterizing subpleural pulmonary lesions, offering particular value in patients for whom invasive procedures are unsuitable or in settings where CT or biopsy is not readily available. KEY POINTS: Accurate characterization of subpleural pulmonary lesions remains challenging using conventional imaging techniques. The grayscale ultrasound radiomics model achieved accuracy comparable to expert radiologists. This model provides a noninvasive and accessible tool when CT or biopsy is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.