ArticleScientific reports2026
Melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance of 2 lx maintains and restores physiological and neurophysiological circadian rhythms in rats.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the non-visual effects of light is increasingly important, as circadian disruption from inappropriate exposure negatively impacts sleep, metabolism, and cognition. However, artificial lighting is rarely designed from a non-visual illuminance perspective, and its effects on biological rhythms remain incompletely evaluated. Here, we investigated three lighting conditions in rats: conventional light–dark (L/D), and two novel settings with matched visual illuminance but differing nighttime rat melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance (2–4 lx; rat mel EDI), enabled by tunable four-package white light-emitting diodes. Circadian rhythms were assessed using physiological (core body temperature, heart rate, locomotor activity) and neurophysiological markers (non-rapid eye movement sleep index, θ–γ cross-frequency coupling) across rhythmicity (periodicity, amplitude), stability (inter-daily stability, intra-daily variability), and state classification (Gaussian mixture modeling, k-means clustering). Relative to 4 lx, the 2 lx lighting most closely resembled L/D in minimizing rhythm loss and maintaining sleep–wake synchrony. Furthermore, after circadian disruption, switching to the 2 lx lighting restored physiological and neurophysiological markers. These findings indicate that spectrally optimized 2 lx lighting is a viable strategy to maintain or reinstate circadian health when nighttime illumination is unavoidable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.