ArticleScientific reports2026
Experimental and coupled quasi-linear viscoelastic biphasic modeling of regional and strain-rate dependent tensile behavior in the temporomandibular joint disc.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a load-bearing fibrocartilaginous articulation that sustains combined tension, compression, and shear. Although the TMJ disc exhibits strong regional and directional heterogeneity, its tensile properties and strain-rate dependence remain insufficiently characterized. Ovine TMJ discs were tested in the anterior, central, and posterior regions along the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions at strain rates of 0.1, 0.5, and 1%/s. Stress–strain curves were quantified, and the time-dependent response was modeled using a coupled quasi-linear viscoelastic (QLV) and biphasic framework. All specimens exhibited a nonlinear toe region followed by a linear tensile response. The AP direction showed substantially higher stiffness (up to 70 MPa), with the central region demonstrating the greatest modulus and ultimate tensile stress. Strain rate significantly influenced stiffness, with rate sensitivity more pronounced in the AP direction than in the ML direction (p < 0.05). The coupled QLV-biphasic model accurately reproduced the nonlinear elastic response (R² = 0.90–0.95). Fluid-phase parameters were adopted from the literature, while solid-phase parameters were identified by fitting to the experimental tensile data. These findings provide region- and direction-specific viscoelastic parameters to improve finite element modeling and support the design of mechanically appropriate disc replacements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.