ArticleScientific reports2026
Prediction of infiltration degree of ground-glass nodules using a fusion of CT radiomics and deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A methodological framework for integrating generalisable deep learning and radiomics fusion model for early lung cancer detection across multi-centre imaging datasets.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores a novel pre- and post-fusion strategy for assessing the infiltration degree of pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs). The infiltration degree was defined according to the pathological progression along the adenocarcinoma spectrum, ranging from atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma in situ to minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and invasive adenocarcinoma. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 517 GGNs patients, collecting clinical data, CT imaging parameters, and CT scans. The dataset was randomly divided into training and testing cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. Clinical and imaging features with P < 0.05 were selected using the chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test to construct a logistic regression-based clinical imaging model. Radiomic features were extracted via PyRadiomics, and deep learning features were obtained using the ResNet-101 framework. Feature selection involved observer consistency tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and LASSO regression. Radiomics and deep learning features were respectively input into 11 machine learning classifiers to build individual models, which were subsequently integrated through a post-fusion strategy to construct the radiomics and deep learning model. Clinical, radiomic, and deep learning features were integrated using pre-fusion, followed by post-fusion of classification results to construct the fusion model. The clinical-imaging model achieved an AUC of 0.745(95% CI: 0.662–0.823), while radiomics and deep learning models reached 0.803(95%CI: 0.728–0.870) and 0.830(95% CI: 0.764–0.892), respectively. The fusion model showed competitive performance, with an AUC of 0.865(95%CI: 0.805–0.916, p < 0.05), demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed pre- and post-fusion strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.