ArticlePain and therapy2026
Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients with Postherpetic Neuralgia and Comorbid Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Pain and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: From Cortical Analgesia to Phenotype-Stratified Clinical Translation.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPostherpetic neuralgia (PHN) frequently coexists with depression and remains associated with poor clinical outcomes despite interventional neuromodulation. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may lower the incidence of poor prognosis in this population. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the effect of perioperative rTMS in patients with PHN and comorbid depression undergoing neuromodulation.
methodsThis randomized, single-center, sham-controlled trial was conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University in Jiangsu Province from February 2025 to November 2025. A total of 174 participants were randomly assigned, stratified by neuromodulation therapy, to receive either 10 Hz rTMS (n = 87) or sham stimulation (n = 87) targeting the primary motor cortex for five consecutive days. The primary outcome was the incidence of poor prognosis at 3 months.
resultsThe incidence of poor prognosis was significantly lower in the rTMS group compared with the sham group (27.4% versus 42.7%; odds ratio [OR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.97; P = 0.039), corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 15.3%. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients in the rTMS group were less likely to experience poor prognosis at 3 months than those in the sham group (adjusted OR, 0.47; 95% CI 0.23-0.95; P = 0.036).
conclusionsIn this randomized controlled trial, perioperative rTMS reduced the risk of unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients with PHN and comorbid depression undergoing neuromodulation, without compromising safety. These findings support rTMS as a promising adjunctive therapeutic strategy in this population.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Register Identifier: ChiCTR2500096978.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.