ArticleScientific reports2026
Profiling the tumor immunological status in Japanese solid cancers using the tumor immune status scoring algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last decade, methods to investigate the immune status of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and predict immune checkpoint blockade efficacy have been intensively developed as immunoscores or immune signatures. However, since the immunological gene signature is a complex and time-consuming approach, a simpler scoring system using numerical data is needed to evaluate a large number of tumors. We previously established a TME immune-type classification system based on PD-L1 and CD8B gene expression, and 5032 cancer patients were classified into 4 types. Based on the expression levels of immune response-associated genes in each type, these genes were assigned scores ranging 1 to 4, representing a spectrum from immunosuppressive to immunostimulating genes. We herein calculated tumor immune status scoring algorithm (TIMMUSCORA) scores based on the expression data of 300 immune response-associated genes in 5,013 pancancer patients, and investigated the relationship of these scores with the prognosis and other clinicopathological features of cancer patients. Rectal cancers with higher scores than the cut-off value of 0 showed a good prognosis, which was closely associated with the immune response-associated genes PDCD1, GZMB, TNFRSF10C, EBI3, and IRF1. A correlation analysis of the rectal cancer cohort suggested that high TIMMUSCORA scores correlated with high TMB value and the consensus molecular subtyping 1 status, while low scores correlated with WNT gene expression. Therefore, the TIMMUSCORA system has potential in evaluations of the immune status of the TME and the prognosis of solid cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.