ArticleScientific reports2026
Opposing end-node and junction-node remodeling patterns in diabetic patients on optical coherence tomography angiography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate macular vascular network topology in diabetic patients. We analyzed 3 × 3 mm OCTA images from 235 eyes of 146 participants, divided into controls, diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy (NoDR), and patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). Skeletonized vascular maps were generated for the superficial (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP). Vessel skeleton density (VSD), End Node (EN) density, Junction Node (JN) density, and Fractal Dimension (FD) were calculated in foveal, parafoveal, and total regions. Statistical comparisons were performed using linear mixed-effects models. EN density exhibited an inverted-U-shaped pattern across groups in both plexuses. VSD, JN density, and FD differed between groups, with lower values in NoDR and NPDR compared to controls. Discrimination analyses indicated that VSD performed better in differentiating NPDR from controls and NoDR, whereas JN density and FD were comparable for differentiating NoDR from controls. After adjusting for VSD across study groups, EN density in both layers and JN density in the SCP remained significant. Vascular metrics correlated with diabetes duration and glycemic level. EN and JN density emerge as promising biomarkers alongside VSD and FD for characterizing microvascular alterations in diabetic eyes, as topology-based parameters may provide information independent of vessel density.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.