ArticleScientific reports2026
A frequency analysis of filterbank initialisation and noise augmentation for LEAF.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differentiable frontends, such as the LEArnable Frontend (LEAF), have drawn increasing interest from the computer audition (CA) community combining the rigour of traditional signal processing techniques with the flexibility and potential of end-to-end deep learning approaches. Concretely, they promise the ability to automatically learn task-specific features, resulting in both higher performance and better interpretability of CA applications. With the adaptability of LEAF’s parameters being questioned in recent literature, we further dig into the reasons why LEAF does not adjust its parameters. We thus perform a detailed analysis investigating the effects of filterbank initialisation for LEAF in a wide, previously unmatched range of computer audition tasks, namely speech recognition, speech emotion recognition, acoustic scene classification, and bird activity detection. In line with literature, we report that performance stays constantly high irrespective of filterbank initialisation, so long as it covers the entire frequency spectrum, in which case adaptation is minimal. Crucially, however, a filterbank initialised with all frequency bands equally does change its centre frequencies and bandwidths, yet remains with a lower performance. This effect is seemingly independent of how information is spread across frequencies, as we confirm in an additional set of experiments with controlled frequency distributions. This points towards the critical role of initialisation and the inductive bias of LEAF and manifests concerns about the adaptability and interpretability of LEAF across many settings. The code for our experiments is publicly available under https://github.com/millinma/LEAFFrequencyAnalysis .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.