Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42034658›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

In ovo versus ex ovo incubation differentially shapes chorioallantoic membrane maturation, angiogenesis, and tumor growth.

Zuzana Demcisakova, Shari Aerts, Julia Hurnikova, Lenka Luptakova, Lukas Urban, Matus Coma, Peter Gal, Liesbeth Couck, Ward De Spiegelaere, Eva Petrovova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zuzana Demcisakova *Department of Morphological Disciplines, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, Kosice, Slovakia. zuzana.demcisakova@uvlf.sk.
Shari Aerts *Department of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition (DI11), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Julia HurnikovaDepartment of Morphological Disciplines, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, Kosice, Slovakia.
Lenka LuptakovaDepartment of Biology and Physiology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, Kosice, Slovakia.
Lukas UrbanDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, Kosice, Slovakia.
Matus ComaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, Kosice, Slovakia.
Peter GalDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, Kosice, Slovakia.
Liesbeth CouckDepartment of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition (DI11), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ward De SpiegelaereDepartment of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition (DI11), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Eva PetrovovaDepartment of Morphological Disciplines, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, Kosice, Slovakia. eva.petrovova@uvlf.sk.

Funding

EU NextGenerationEU through the Recovery and Resilience Plan for Slovakia 09I03-03-V05-00017Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Research, Development and Youth of the Slovak Republic VEGA-1/0074/24Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Research, Development and Youth of the Slovak Republic VEGA-1/0185/26Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Research, Development and Youth of the Slovak Republic VEGA-1/0436/24Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-20-0073Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-22-0006Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-23-0372Slovak Research and Development Agency VV-MVP-24-0327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) is a highly vascularized avian extraembryonic membrane, widely used as an in vivo model for angiogenesis, with predominant application in tumor research. CAM assays are performed under in ovo or ex ovo conditions; however, a clear rationale for model selection is lacking, and comparative morphological data remain limited. In this study, we compared chicken embryo CAM development under both incubation conditions. Morphological analyses revealed pronounced incubation-dependent differences in CAM maturation, with the mesoderm showing the most dynamic alterations. Ex ovo CAMs exhibited early mesodermal thickening, and peaks in angiogenesis; indicative of accelerated but less coordinated tissue and vascular development. In ovo CAMs showed a gradual and well-coordinated increase in mesodermal thickness and vascularization, peaking at later developmental stages. Differences were also observed in epithelial organization: ex ovo CAMs exhibited disrupted ectodermal architecture, whereas in ovo CAMs maintained stable epithelial stratification. Functional assessment using GFP-labelled human fibrosarcoma cells (HT1080) demonstrated significantly higher embryo survival and larger tumor growth in the in ovo model, while ex ovo conditions were associated with increased mortality and reduced tumor size. These findings demonstrate that incubation conditions significantly influence CAM morphology and functional performance, highlighting the importance of careful model selection in angiogenesis research.

Indexed as

AngiogenesisChorioallantoic MembraneNeovascularization, PathologicNeovascularization, PhysiologicAnimalsCell Line, TumorChick EmbryoHumansAllantoisChicken embryoChorioallantoic membraneChorionOncologyTumor research

Identifiers

PMID42034658
PMCPMC13284325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.