ArticleScientific reports2026
In ovo versus ex ovo incubation differentially shapes chorioallantoic membrane maturation, angiogenesis, and tumor growth.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) is a highly vascularized avian extraembryonic membrane, widely used as an in vivo model for angiogenesis, with predominant application in tumor research. CAM assays are performed under in ovo or ex ovo conditions; however, a clear rationale for model selection is lacking, and comparative morphological data remain limited. In this study, we compared chicken embryo CAM development under both incubation conditions. Morphological analyses revealed pronounced incubation-dependent differences in CAM maturation, with the mesoderm showing the most dynamic alterations. Ex ovo CAMs exhibited early mesodermal thickening, and peaks in angiogenesis; indicative of accelerated but less coordinated tissue and vascular development. In ovo CAMs showed a gradual and well-coordinated increase in mesodermal thickness and vascularization, peaking at later developmental stages. Differences were also observed in epithelial organization: ex ovo CAMs exhibited disrupted ectodermal architecture, whereas in ovo CAMs maintained stable epithelial stratification. Functional assessment using GFP-labelled human fibrosarcoma cells (HT1080) demonstrated significantly higher embryo survival and larger tumor growth in the in ovo model, while ex ovo conditions were associated with increased mortality and reduced tumor size. These findings demonstrate that incubation conditions significantly influence CAM morphology and functional performance, highlighting the importance of careful model selection in angiogenesis research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.