ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2026
Plasma proteomics for Parkinson's disease classification: cross-cohort benchmarking of proteomic, transcriptomic, and multimodal models.
Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood-based biomarkers could facilitate early detection and severity monitoring for Parkinson's disease (PD), yet the relative diagnostic utility of proteomic versus transcriptomic signals and the added value of multimodal integration under cross-cohort transfer remain unclear. We trained diagnostic classifiers (PD versus healthy control) using targeted plasma proteomics (Olink) and whole-blood RNA sequencing from a development cohort under participant-grouped cross-validation with nested preprocessing, then externally validated models on an independent cohort. RNA-only models were benchmarked across multiple dimensionality-reduction and regularization strategies, and multimodal integration was evaluated using early fusion, balanced early fusion, late fusion, and stacking. A Proteomic Severity Index (PSI) was derived from baseline protein expression and assessed with linear and non-linear regressors. The proteomics-only Random Forest classifier achieved the strongest external validation (AUROC = 0.8724, 95% CI 0.8305-0.9097; AUPRC = 0.8989), whereas the best RNA-only configuration reached only 0.5978. No fusion strategy significantly improved discrimination beyond proteomics alone. Among 32 selected proteins, DDC showed the strongest severity association with total MDS-UPDRS (ρ = 0.61), and the linear PSI explained 28.2% of severity variance, though PSI residuals showed no independent longitudinal association. These findings support targeted plasma proteomics as the primary molecular modality for blood-based PD biomarker development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.