Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42034057›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2026

Mutual antagonism between PRC1 condensates and SWI/SNF in chromatin regulation.

Stefan Niekamp, Sharon K Marr, Rebecca Sanon, Philipp C Schneider, Radhika Subramanian, Robert E Kingston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Polycomb-mediated 3D chromatin interactions in gene regulation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefan NiekampDepartment of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Sharon K MarrDepartment of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Rebecca SanonDepartment of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Philipp C SchneiderDepartment of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Radhika SubramanianDepartment of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: radhika@molbio.mgh.harvard.edu.
Robert E KingstonDepartment of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: kingston@molbio.mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

Functional Analysis of Epigenetic ComplexesR35GM131743 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROBERT KINGSTON · 2019 to 2026
$7.0M
Unraveling the Dynamic Competition Between Activating and Repressive Complexes in Shaping Chromatin AccessibilityK99GM155610 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NIEKAMP, STEFAN · 2024 to 2025
$250k
NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM155610NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opposing activities of conserved chromatin regulatory complexes, such as the Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and the activating chromatin remodeler switch/sucrose non-fermentable (SWI/SNF), play critical roles in regulating gene expression during development and differentiation. The mechanisms by which these complexes compete to regulate chromatin states remain poorly understood. We combine single-molecule analysis and genomic approaches in cultured cells to demonstrate that the condensate-forming properties of PRC1 play an important role in excluding SWI/SNF from chromatin. Consistently, PRC1 compositions with higher condensate-forming propensity are more effective in preventing SWI/SNF binding. Conversely, SWI/SNF-bound chromatin significantly reduces PRC1 binding and subsequent condensate formation. Notably, SWI/SNF can suppress PRC1 condensate formation in an ATP-hydrolysis-independent manner. We propose that the condensate properties of different PRC1 compositions drive mutual PRC1-SWI/SNF antagonism to properly balance these competing regulatory activities during development.

Indexed as

ChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistonePolycomb Repressive Complex 1Transcription FactorsAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsHumansMiceProtein BindingSingle Molecule ImagingCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistonePolycomb Repressive Complex 1PRC1 protein, humanSWI-SNF-B chromatin-remodeling complexTranscription FactorsBAF complexchromatincondensatesgene expressionPolycombPRC1single-molecule microscopySWI/SNFtranscription

Identifiers

PMID42034057
PMCPMC13224753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.